Event Title

Indigenous Stone Structures and Cluster Analysis

Location

Hart 117

Start Time

10-5-2018 1:10 PM

End Time

10-5-2018 1:40 PM

Description

In the course of my 5-year study of indigenous stone structures of the eastern seaboard of the US and Canada, I have recovered locational information on over 5,500 sites containing structures of various types: rock piles, cairns, stone rows, U-shaped structures, standing stones, split-filled boulders, balanced rocks, marked stones, petroglyphs, stone circles, effigies, mounds, platforms, enclosures, and niches. More than half of these sites are found in well-defined site clusters, some of which overlap modern political boundaries. This suggests that their creation precedes the creation of those boundaries, further suggesting their indigenous origin. Two types of cluster analysis – variance mean ratio and nearest-neighbor – were used to determine whether the clusters are statistically real, or if they are simply random placements. The conclusion is that there is close to 0% probability that they are randomly distributed. The implications of this will be explored.

Comments

Moderator: Joseph Seggio

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 10th, 1:10 PM May 10th, 1:40 PM

Indigenous Stone Structures and Cluster Analysis

Hart 117

In the course of my 5-year study of indigenous stone structures of the eastern seaboard of the US and Canada, I have recovered locational information on over 5,500 sites containing structures of various types: rock piles, cairns, stone rows, U-shaped structures, standing stones, split-filled boulders, balanced rocks, marked stones, petroglyphs, stone circles, effigies, mounds, platforms, enclosures, and niches. More than half of these sites are found in well-defined site clusters, some of which overlap modern political boundaries. This suggests that their creation precedes the creation of those boundaries, further suggesting their indigenous origin. Two types of cluster analysis – variance mean ratio and nearest-neighbor – were used to determine whether the clusters are statistically real, or if they are simply random placements. The conclusion is that there is close to 0% probability that they are randomly distributed. The implications of this will be explored.