Beyond the Magical Thinking behind the Principal Principle
David Lewis's Principal Principle (PP) states that our credence in a single case follows from the general probability of all such cases. Against this stands the Challenge Argument (CA) – to show that the inference is justified. Recent (1) law-to-chance, (2) Bayesian, and (3) propensity theories of probability take up the challenge – but, I argue, fall short. Rather, we should understand (4) propensity via Aristotle's analysis of spontaneity (5) and probabilistic reasoning via the Anti-PP and (6) the practice of bundling one offs, where (7) forced bad-odds one offs illuminate how extensive a role luck plays in our lives.
James, E. (2015). Beyond the Magical Thinking behind the Principal Principle. Philosophy, 90 (3), 479-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819115000121
Virtual Commons Citation
James, Edward W. (2015). Beyond the Magical Thinking behind the Principal Principle. In Philosophy Faculty Publications. Paper 57.
Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/philosophy_fac/57