Feminicides of indigenous women are not easy to distinguish in the data and statistics that feminist activists collect, to document gender-based violence against women in general. The killing of women because they are women responds to a legal definition that specifically refers to a particular type of victim: poor, working-class, urban women (Lagarde 2008). Very often the violent deaths of indigenous women defending communal/territorial resources, or violent acts related to the militarization of rural areas and extortion by organized crime may not necessarily be classified as feminicide since that violence is the result of the intersectionality of several orders of discrimination in contexts where the state has failed to protect citizens (Wright 2017). This paper will explore diverse initiatives developed by indigenous women activists aimed at unveiling the epistemological and political limitations of feminist statistics that neither record the ethnicity/race of the victims, not the socio-political contexts that shape indigenous community life. In addition, this paper will reflect upon indigenous women’s calls for alliances with the academy in order to develop appropriate conceptual approaches, methodologies and strategies, gaining a better understanding of the multiple orders of violence that operate against racialized bodies. Our ultimate goal is to build a mindful alliance between academy and indigenous activism to decolonize our activist ethos and highlight claims of justice from rural scenarios that are frequently overlooked.
Romero, Dolores Figueroa
Políticas de Feminicidio en México: Perspectivasinterseccionales de mujeres indígenas para.reconsiderar su definición teórica-legal y las metodología de recolección de datos.
Journal of International Women's Studies, 20(8), 64-86.
Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol20/iss8/5